|
Poster #: |
|
Discipline: |
|
Presenters: |
|
|
|
50 point Rating Scale: Excellent = 45-50 Very Good = 40-45 Good = 35-40 Satisfactory = 25-35 Needs Improvement = below 25
|
|
|
|
Part I. POSTER CONTENT:
- Abstract: Summary of poster, including clear statement of hypothesis, experimental methods, results and main conclusion.
- Abstract: Quality of writing – clear, complete, concise.
- Poster is complete and contains an introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion and conclusion sections.
- Sections are placed in appropriate order.
- Illustration-quality photographs, diagrams, figures, etc.
- Text quality – poster is easy to read from a reasonable distance.
|
|
__________(50) |
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
Part II. VERBAL PRESENTATION:
- Presenter can explain his or her work in a clear manner and has the ability to maintain audience interest.
- Presenter has the ability to describe how data was collected and analyzed.
- Presenter can clearly summarize the body of work.
- Presenter can answer questions.
|
|
__________(50) |
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
Total Score (Part I & Part II): |
|
__________(100) |
Previous Page
Back to 2008 Undergraduate Research Poster Session
Next Page