Judging Criteria for Disciplines Other than Natural & Social Sciences

Poster #: _____   

Discipline: ____________

Presenter(s) Last Name: ______________

 


50 point Rating Scale:
Excellent = 45-50
Very Good = 40-45
Good = 35-40
Satisfactory = 25-35
Needs Improvement = below 25

 


Part I. POSTER CONTENT:

  • Abstract: Summary of poster, including clear statement of hypothesis, experimental methods, results and main conclusion.
  • Abstract: Quality of writing – clear, complete, concise.
  • Poster is complete and contains an introduction, materials and methods, results, discussion and conclusion sections.
  • Sections are placed in appropriate order.
  • Illustration-quality photographs, diagrams, figures, etc.
  • Text quality – poster is easy to read from a reasonable distance.

__________(50)

Comments:

 


Part II. VERBAL PRESENTATION:

  • Presenter can explain his or her work in a clear manner and has the ability to maintain audience interest.
  • Presenter has the ability to describe how data was collected and analyzed.
  • Presenter can clearly summarize the body of work.
  • Presenter can answer questions.

__________(50)

Comments:

 

Total Score (Part I & Part II):

__________(100)